You must know what you got,when you dig a trash-pearl like this!
Hot gal’s in a bloody crazy story,that’s it!
One of the best movies of my favourite Scream-Queen “MICHELLE BAUER”
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Chainsaws come in different types and sizes. Choose the right chainsaw for your workload.
A chainsaw is a movable, mechanical and motorized saw mostly used in logging activities. It is used in place of axes and manual saws to cut big and heavy logs more easily. Newer and better chainsaws are being developed and specialized, depending on the job that needs to be done.
Based on popular opinion, the lighter the chainsaw, the more powerful and durable it is, and easier to maneuver. Manufactures hear this. They use newer and lighter materials in their production.
Here are eight suggestions of small chainsaws. Almost all these chainsaws have 14″ and 16″ guided bars. They are the more affordable lot, ranging from $180 to $400.
The dolmar small chainsaws can transform logging to arbor power. The echo small chainsaws are good for limbing and trimming works. The husqvarna small chainsaw is a small powerhouse but is very handy. The craftsman small chainsaw is economical and with dependable quality.
The jonsered small chainsaw is available in only 16″ guide bars, reliable chainsaw prices and durable. The RedMax small chainsaws is also available in only 16″ guide bars. The solo small chainsaw is also very powerful. And the stihl small chainsaw can cut smoothly without sacrificing power and durability.
There are many other recommended chainsaws. One is the homelite ranger. Many people say that this engine outperforms its range price. This has become the best choice for all home owners. It has safety features to lessen accidents at work. One important feature is the anti-vibration to protect the nerves in your arms. Another one is its ability to control kickbacks, and thereby less strenuous to the arms and legs.Chain tension can be adjusted by a screw driver.
The craftsman 34118 is way cheaper than any electric chainsaw. One of its more prominent features is the anti-vibrating handle, making the machine easier to handle. The tension can be easily adjusted according to the workload. It also has a quick brake to prevent accidents, and convenient chain oiling. However, one setback is its noise. It produces loud cracking sounds that can be irritating for some users.
The Stilhl MS 180 C-BE is recommended for easy, fast and smooth cutting. It is convenient and safe to use also. The bar tapers prevent kickbacks.
Also try the Husqvarna 316. This machine is very quiet, producing very minimal sounds in operation. It also needs less maintenance. The power cable extends to 100 feet at least, making it more maneuverable and mobile. It cuts faster than an electric chainsaw also. It has a safety measure of automatic chain break and an anti-vibration handle.
Another one worth trying is the Black and Decker CCS818. The best thing about this machine is its cordless feature. It can therefore be taken in any workplace. It runs on battery, and the runtime is very sufficient for every full charging. Although, it is less powerful compared to other models, it is enough for light workloads like cutting small branches or trimming trees. It also performs quietly.
There are a lot more chainsaws available in the market. The ones mentioned here are just some of the best chainsaws used by many people. Depending on your work, choose carefully among the prominent features of chainsaws.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
I’ve been really excited about the AMD Phenom II x2 3.1GHz processor, but not many computer manufacturers offer this chip. I have long been a fan of AMD over Intel, but if someone can make a really compelling case on an Intel chip, I would be willing to listen.This will be a gaming PC. Here are some of the other things I am looking for:1. Solid state drive chainsaw prices as primary hard drive. I would like to run the operating system and most everyday programs off this drive. I’m thinking around 80-160 gigs will be sufficient with a 500 gig or so standard (hdd) for media, etc.2. The computer must run quiet! My current rig sounds like a chainsaw at its worst, which drives my wife crazy. I promised the next system would run smooth quietly.3. Cost should be a major consideration. I’d like to cap costs at $1500, but ideally less than $1000 (system only necessary, no monitor, keyboard, software besides Windows 7 beta).4. End result should be a system capable of running current games at impressive settings. I don’t need my eyeballs to melt, but I don’t want to be annoyed at shoddy performance.Please suggestion manufacturers capable of implementing these kinds of requests for a reasonable price. It would help if I could get specific examples + prices.Thanks in advance to the community!
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Search RSS | FindArticles
FindArticles - Search Alert on - Be alerted whenever your search results change on FindArticles.com.
Electronic News - The Changing Face of Price Warfare
January 31, 2000 -- The Changing Face of Price Warfare.(Intel vs AMD)(Company Business and Marketing)
So there's a price war in the PC processor business between...
South Florida CEO - Core values: Sunbeam was left in shambles after infamous CEO Al Dunlap's acquisition spree sent the company into bankruptcy. Now the old core values are back in play, with company veteran Andy Hill at the helm. His promise: no surprises - Manufacturing
April 1, 2003 -- Before Enron's Jeffrey Skilling and WorldCom's Bernie Ebbers, there was "Chainsaw Al" Dunlap, then CEO of Boca Raton-based Sunbeam Corp. Hired in...
Evening Chronicle (Newcastle, England) - Rock and roll like a guitar hero
April 27, 2007 -- Byline: By Douglas Young
Byline: By Douglas Young
Title: Guitar Hero II
Format: Xbox 360
Publisher: Activision
...
{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }
Chain was a perfect fit, good materials, easier than sharpening. Keep the chain sharp for safety.
This films suffers from what most “prequel” films do, in that you already know that the most important players are not going to have any real danger or harm brought to them. And in a horror film, that is simply downright destructive. But even without this handicap, this film is lacking in many other ways.
Trying to give us origins of the legend Leatherface and his brood, the film comes up short in actually giving you any of the insights it supposedly is to provide. The story is very incoherent, at times, giving you little understanding or interest in seeing what is happening on the screen. Sure, we get to learn who’s face was used to make the famous mask and some interesting, if underdeveloped, tidbits about how the family became cannibals, but none of it ever gels into a film that creates a story that sucks you in. So, when the killings start, you really have little in the way of fear or interest in what you are seeing. None of the actors here provided any depth or intrigue to their roles, so you never come to feel anything for them, whether they are a killer or a victim.
The one thing the film does provided is plenty of graphic gore. Gore-fiends will no doubt get what they want. But there is no psychological edge to it, as was done in the original film. It just ends up as splatter for the sake of shock alone, like many of the “torture porn” movies that are passed off for modern horror films today.
This is what modern slasher films have come to, in the wake of films like “Hostel” and “Saw.” But those, at least, were done from original concepts, unlike this one, which uses the “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” name to draw fans of it to this pitiful display. This is easily one of the worst films of this franchise and an insult to true horror films of every kind. Unless you are simply a fan of watching blood splatter, this is a film you need to simply steer clear from.
in thismovie they take you back on how leatherface became who he is now today. thats why i like this movie so much because it needed to be told. but after this i hope they don’t make another before they ruin it.
if you really enjoyed the brutal remake to Tobe’s original film you’re probably gonna dig this prequel . i only detracted one star as we do not get a Ms. Bile ending . just the filmakers choice . i respect that . i think both young directors do an excellent job of scaring the hell out of the audience . i can kind of understand the older viewers cleaving to their 1970’s baby . i’m that way when it comes to a lot of films as i was born in 63′ and resist a lot of the modernizations in filmaking . these films are of the horror genre though . i see their redux’s as a good thing precisely because they can show a lot more of the grue and spatter . they’re better photographed . i’d have prefered a more up ending . that may well have been untrue to this very hostile vision . yet again r. Lee Ermey absolutely steals the show as the head of household .
I remember seeing Jonathan Liebesman’s first film “Darkness Falls” at the Toronto Film Festival before it hit theatres. It was an awful movie that nonetheless showed great promise on the part of the director. Beginning vindicated that notion. His TCM prequel is easily one of the best of the entire series.
The bloody bits were brutal, and harrowing, and the Vietnam motif – and metaphor – imbued the film with a power Marcus Nispel’s re-imagining lacked. Granted, the tension is undercut somewhat by the fact that we anticipate certain family members must survive in order to have appeared in the previous film, which takes place a few years after the events of this movie (remember this is a prequel) , but R. Lee Ermy’s leering performance as the depraved Sheriff Hoyt, not to mention the historic explanation he provides for the family’s cannibalism and the sadistic “tests” he subjects the kids to, are intriguing enough to sustain audience interest.
Lastly, by not giving Thomas Hewitt his human skin mask until the tail end of the third act – a decision akin to stripping Jason Vorhees of his Goalie mask – the filmmakers demonstrate gumption often missing in horror films.
When I first saw this movie as a kid after seeing the first one I thought this is not scary at all. It seemed more funny and pointless,but as I got older and re watched it and WATCHED THE INTERVIEWS!!!!!! which most people don’t and understand why tobe hooper made the film he did. The film is great if you like dark humor and understand the whole back story of what happened after the first one. Only thing that has me wondering is the end of the movie when caroline williams is at the top swinging the chainsaw what happens to her? However CHOP TOP IS NOT DEAD. Go to google search and look for chop top there is suppose to be a movie coming out some day about how chop top didn’t die at the end. As far as the movie goes if you pay close attention part 1 and 2 connect ,but the rest of the series is dead.
It’s almost impossible to believe that the same director made the original TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE – spare, beautifully filmed and relentlessly terrifying… and this slack-jacked ugly-looking mess of camp garbage. MASSACRE 2 is played strictly for third-grade gross-out laughs throughout – there’s not a scary moment in it. Dennis Hopper chews the MST3K-type scenery… Caroline Williams wears the face-skin of her dead friend, in one cringe-inducing sequence… and that’s all, folks. A totally bankrupt imagination here – the unforgettable dinner-party sequence from MASSACRE 1 is recreated almost verbatim… complete with grandpa unable to “get it up”, to bop screaming heroine on the head. TCSM 1 is a masterpiece – Number 2 is, literally, number two.
For once the sequel is just as good as the first movie. this is a very good film though not as scary as the first but still good
This is one of the most unfairly victimized sequels in the history of cinema. Sure this sequel isn’t as good as the original, but it’s still a damn fine horror film. I mean come on, a 5.1 out of 10 on IMDB? Critics of course hated the film (Gee how totally surprising!), but I’m happy to see that this film does have a cult following (Which I’m now a part of). This is my second favorite film of the TCM series, and I have had a great time watching this series (Just one more film to go, gotta buy the third one. And yes, I even liked The Next Generation).
WHAT IT’S ABOUT: This film takes place 13 years after the first film. It starts off with two jerks in a car calling and hassling a radio station host calling herself Stretch, and they won’t hang up. But then the two get killed by Leatherface over the phone and the call is recorded. Then we are introduced to a police officer who calls himself Lefty who is out to get revenge against this cannibalistic Sawyer family who killed his nephew and caused his niece (The survivor in the first film) to go insane. No one believes him except for Stretch who recorded the phone call and no other officers will help him or investigate. Now he, with the help of Stretch is out to find the Sawyer family and kill them…using chainsaws. And yes, the chainsaw fights are awesomely epic and completely gruesome. You’re in for one helluva crazy ride like no other. This film has a mind of its own and doesn’t want to be like the other films in the franchise.
MUSIC: Corny? Most definitely as most 80’s music is. And it is awesome! I do have to admit I do miss this music in horror films in this day and age.
ACTING: Completely over the top in every way. This is some of the most ridiculous acting I’ve ever seen in a horror film. It was very difficult to take these actors seriously (Sorry Caroline Williams, but your performance will never outdo Marilyn Burns’ performance in the original). I don’t think I’ve ever seen Dennis Hopper do a performance as ludicrous and bizarre as this. Thankfully, the acting is the fun kind of stupid and you’ll have a good time watching it. There are even some actors from the first film who return to reprise their roles.
ACTION: This film is more violent than its predecessor, and it stacks on the gore (The gore effects are done by Tom Savini who did the gore for films such as Dawn of the Dead and Day of the Dead). However, I felt as if they didn’t use Tom Savini’s talent of creating amazing make-up effects as they should have. However, the action scenes are a sight to behold. For example: Picture the sword fights you’ve seen in other films, but replace the swords with chainsaws. That’s right, we get a chainsaw-fighting scene between Leatherface and Dennis Hopper (It’s especially awesome when Dennis Hopper dual-wields two mini chainsaws). This film retains the fantastically creepy set designs of the original and makes them even more demented by having the Sawyer family’s hideout being an abandoned theme park covered by the skeleton decorations and other disturbing items. Needless to say, this film is just as disturbing and even more bizarre than the original. It was never boring and it’s ridiculously fun to watch. However it lacked one thing that makes it lose to the original; scares and the feeling of true horror. This film just isn’t scary, but mostly really gory and ridiculous simultaneously. That’s not a bad combination at all, but it will never beat the original classic.
OVERALL: Give this sequel a chance and don’t listen to the haters. It is easily one of the best sequels I’ve ever seen, and I had a lot of fun watching it. Just don’t take it seriously (Though it was never meant to be taken seriously), and you’ll have a good time. Insanity proves to be rather fun for once.
THE GOOD: Ridiculously over the top, gruesomely gory, awesomely cheesy music and acting, it was never boring, and awesome action scenes.
THE BAD: Acting can be a bit too over the top sometimes.
You must log in to post a comment.